Skip to main content

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Since when is not paying a debt considered "fraud"

Date: Wed, 07/18/2007 - 10:51

Submitted by JEN5276
on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 10:51

Posts: 394 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 17

Since when is not paying a debt considered "fraud"


As far as I know, not paying a debt is just that, not paying a debt. It's not fraud unless you are embezzling money or something of that sort, right?

And, if the debt in question is illegal (as they are with many of these IPLs) how can they enforce anything?

How many people each day default on credit cards, car loans, personal loans, etc? It's not considered fraud in those cases....

Just some food for thought.


Yeah these places will stop at nothing. It seems to me like MTE has really gotten nasty lately, too. A lot of people are having major problems with them. Jen, I was accused by DMS Marketing aka The Loan Shop of being a "Runner!!" They told me I wrote bad checks, committed fraud, etc..........


lrhall41

Submitted by Sassnlucy on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 11:11

( Posts: 2698 | Credits: )


OMG, Sass, that's crazy!

I have dealt with some nasty collection agencies in the past, but this takes things to a whole new level.

I can't wait for the fun to begin.

But, I'm wondering, since I got my AG on the case, if they will back down (MTE). I hope so! I am just looking to get the PIF, but a refund would be a delight! :)


lrhall41

Submitted by JEN5276 on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 11:21

( Posts: 394 | Credits: )


Some of the more interesting IPDL threats:

-"...you're committing interstate wire fraud..."
-"...you're committing fraud by check..."
-"...you will be arrested and we have 20 people coming to your door in 5 minutes, so find someplace for your kids to go..."
-"....we're going to tell your boss you owe this money and you will be fired..."
-"...we're going to tell your mom (or aunt, or cousin, or grandmother) that you owe this money and we expect THEM to pay it for you..."

and on and on...ad nauseum.

These places will try ANYTHING to get you to pay - especially after you start asserting your rights as a consumer and requesting to be marked paid in full. If you have already paid the principal and the interest allowed by your state PDL Law, keep fighting! In some cases, you can obtain a refund...in others, just simply getting them to leave you alone is a major victory!


lrhall41

Submitted by SUEBEEHONEY70 on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 14:17

( Posts: 4583 | Credits: )


jen, thank you for posting this! It caught my eye, of course! And I thank you! Yes, I am now being accused of committing "fraud", which totally freaked my butt out! I took out a loan and committed "fraud". The "fraud department" is investigating. Lord, if I heard the word "fraud" one more time, I was going to hang myself! I'm glad to see I'm not the only one accused of committing "fraud". Lord have mercy. It's been one hell of a day! jen, I thank you again. You're thinking of me & that makes me feel so much better. Like I always say - you guys are the only friends I have! :lol:


lrhall41

Submitted by cannr on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 18:54

( Posts: 9317 | Credits: )


Cannr, $500fastcash sent me the "FRAUD" email. It scared me at first but then I thought about what the definition of fraud is. DECEIT, TRICKERY, CHEATING!! SOMETHING SAID OR DONE TO DECEIVE; TRICK; ARTIFICE.
Have any of you done this???? HELL NO, but the PDL's have! I DID NOT take out a loan with the intention of not paying. I DID NOT try to trick them out of the amount of money that I borrowed and I DID NOT and I have NOT tried to cheat them out of anything! BUT I WILL NOT CONTINUE TO PAY MORE THAN WHAT I HAVE ALREADY PAID TO THEM.


lrhall41

Submitted by bflow30 on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 19:00

( Posts: 519 | Credits: )


Lying on a credit application in order to obtain a loan , or providing false information where a lender would rely on such information as a basis for their approval, could be considered fraud. 18 US Code 1104 does actually prescribe criminal penalties of "not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both." If you do it through the mail, add in 'mail fraud'. On the internet may constitute 'wire fraud'.

However, most payday loans will not fall into the categories mentioned in the pretext of this federal statute, since they are not really part of the federal reserve system.

Some states do consider writing bad checks as fraud. This varies from state to state as to whether they would actually prosecute over it. Moreover, writing a check against a closed account is more severe, and could often carry criminal penalties.

That being said, these are really the only two reasons when not paying a debt can be considered fraud. If you are truthful on your application and you haven't written checks against a closed account, then there is nothing criminal about not paying a debt. All the threats are just a scare tactic.


lrhall41

Submitted by DebtCruncher on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 19:22

( Posts: 2293 | Credits: )


I understand that writing a bad check would be considered fraud. I also understand that providing false information on an application would be considered fraud. However, my issue is with internet pdl's that were debiting me to death and I blocked the debits. They are throwing "fraud" at me left and right. These are internet pdl's that I have contacted regarding my loan, only to be ignored. These are internet pdl's that I informed I was revoking debit authorization, only to be ignored. So can they claim fraud???


lrhall41

Submitted by cannr on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 19:32

( Posts: 9317 | Credits: )


I think that if you look at the wording on most bad check laws, the laws apply specifically to paper checks. Paper checks are a one time deal. The theory is, that when you write a paper check, you know whether that check will clear or not.

When we look at an automatic/recurring ACH authorization ... you can't tell what is going to happen to your bank account a year from now. Signing up for ACH payments, and then having insufficient funds or closing the account later on down the road, does not of itself prove fraud. To nail you with fraud, the PDL would have to show your "intent to defraud" -- they would have to prove that you gave them ACH authorization while knowing your account would be closed. They simply cannot prove that.

Aside, as other have said, the PDLs are most likely illegal anyway and so they aren't going to step foot in a court room, lest the be nailed for their own illegal practice.

Another thing to consider... if it was fraud to have your bank block debits from those companies ... then why would your bank let you do it? I'm sure if you went into your bank and told them you planned on writing a bad check, they would tell you not to. So why would your bank knowingly let you commit fraud by blocking debits on your account?


lrhall41

Submitted by DebtCruncher on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 19:47

( Posts: 2293 | Credits: )


cannr - the IPDL companies CAN and WILL throw the fraud claim around - a lot. However, they don't have a leg to stand on , and they know it. Their threats are baseless, and they have no power to follow through on them. They cannot have you arrested, charged with fraud, take your kids away, have you fired, etc.

There is very little they CAN do to you, other than annoy the heck out of you with threatening e-mails and phone calls, and they know it. That's why they do so much of it.

However....

there is one very important thing you (and anyone dealing with an IPDL) need to be aware of. If there is a wage assignment agreement in any contract you signed, you need to revoke it immediately, or they may send it to your payroll department and begin taking part of your paycheck.


lrhall41

Submitted by SUEBEEHONEY70 on Thu, 07/19/2007 - 05:15

( Posts: 4583 | Credits: )


Thanks guys! No wage assignments. However, I did include revoking any wage assignments I may have signed in my pdl letters, just to be on the safe side and cover my butt. However, I'm lucky enough to work for a small company and my boss would basically laugh if one of these pdl's tried to attempt that. Of course, it would be embarrassing - as I do not want any of my co-workers to know what's going on! But he wouldn't honor any wage assignment anyway! But, like I said, I included that in my letter (learning from reading on this forum)in the very beginning just to be safe.


lrhall41

Submitted by cannr on Thu, 07/19/2007 - 07:03

( Posts: 9317 | Credits: )